<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>remote_plot/LICENSE, branch master</title>
<subtitle>Archived. Has license issues. Plot on GUI a remote file updating using https://git.flylightning.xyz/mycan</subtitle>
<id>http://git.flylightning.xyz/remote_plot/atom?h=master</id>
<link rel='self' href='http://git.flylightning.xyz/remote_plot/atom?h=master'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.flylightning.xyz/remote_plot/'/>
<updated>2025-05-16T01:43:06Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Change license from GPL-2.0-or-later to GPL-3.0-or-later</title>
<updated>2025-05-16T01:43:06Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Xiao Pan</name>
<email>xyz@flylightning.xyz</email>
</author>
<published>2025-05-16T01:43:06Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.flylightning.xyz/remote_plot/commit/?id=72d8048866ee019d780d94941cd2c82211499e4e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:72d8048866ee019d780d94941cd2c82211499e4e</id>
<content type='text'>
I just realized I can use GPL-3.0-or-later. I prefer GPL-3.0-or-later
over GPL-2.0-or-later. And libssh's LGPL-2.1-or-later, plplot's
LGPL-2.0-or-later, and gtk's LGPL-2.1-or-later licenses are compatible
with GPL-3.0-or-later.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The software is licensed under GPL-2.0-or-later</title>
<updated>2025-05-16T01:23:36Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Xiao Pan</name>
<email>xyz@flylightning.xyz</email>
</author>
<published>2025-05-16T01:20:05Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.flylightning.xyz/remote_plot/commit/?id=1e14f67953c2ee72c816e97bcce93a273be487d2'/>
<id>urn:sha1:1e14f67953c2ee72c816e97bcce93a273be487d2</id>
<content type='text'>
The software is licensed under GPL-2.0-or-later. But list.c and list.h
contain source code I edited from book "C Primer Plus" Chapter17
practice problem 2 which contain codes from its example codes, and the
author of "C Primer Plus" does not have a license for list.c and list.h,
so the author of "C Primer Plus" has the copyright on list.c and list.h,
so list.c and list.h can be considered non-free close souce proprietary
code.

I choose GPL-2.0-or-later. Because I prefer GPL over LGPL. And because
libssh's LGPL-2.1-or-later, plplot's LGPL-2.0-or-later, and gtk's
LGPL-2.1-or-later licenses are compatible with GPL-2.0-or-later.

This commit also clarify licensing by copy the GPL-2.0-or-later license
to LICENSE file, adding notes in README.md, and adding
SPDX-License-Identifier and other licensing comment in source code
files.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>init, GPL-2.0-or-later license not sure if correct</title>
<updated>2024-11-25T02:08:45Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Xiao Pan</name>
<email>xyz@flylightning.xyz</email>
</author>
<published>2024-11-25T02:08:45Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.flylightning.xyz/remote_plot/commit/?id=9b51a1a20d060e7ebdb25addcab0c1e1b9bdd6a5'/>
<id>urn:sha1:9b51a1a20d060e7ebdb25addcab0c1e1b9bdd6a5</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
